Posts Tagged ‘presidential candidate’

This is a GREAT blog post from Summit Ministries. It really gets to the roots (and I have searched and found more responses/rebuttals) of two main arguments I have been hearing throughout the campaign season, from people who have spoken to me about their thoughts on voting at all in this election.

The arguments from CHRISTIANS:

1: “I am a Christian American and I am not going to vote in this election because I don’t want to vote against my Biblical conscious.” (!!)

2: “Romney’s no different than Obama. I am not going to vote for the ‘lesser of two evils’ because they are both evil.”

Usually, the main concern I have found these Christians have towards Romney is that he is a Mormon and they just can’t vote for him because of it. One person told me, “I will be held accountable to GOD, so I can’t vote for either because they’re just not the ‘right ones’.”

LISTEN UP CHRISTIANS!

1: If only 15% of you “Christians” even voted four years ago, we wouldn’t be in the pickle we’re in now. NOT voting IS voting for the other side. You are giving your TACIT CONSENT, to put it in simple terms…

2: If you’re not registered to vote, stop complaining.

3: You’re NEVER going to get a candidate you agree with 100%. Jesus is NOT on the ballot.

4: Read ROMANS 13 and tell me now if the Bible doesn’t say Christians should get involved in government/politics.

5: DC is only as corrupt as you allow it to be. YOU are the ones who VOTE your leaders and representatives in office. Remember that.

<END RANT>

Now, be sure to read this:

Rapid Response: Can Christians Vote for Mormons?

Editor’s Note: Summit Ministries endorses neither political candidates nor political parties. While not an endorsement, this Rapid Response addresses two pressing questions many Christians are asking as the autumn elections approach: Is the Mormon Church a Christian church? May Christians vote for Mormons?

Kevin James Bywater is the Director and Resident Scholar of the Summit Oxford Study Centre. In his essay on Summit’s website, “Mormonism: A Survey and Biblical Critique,” he addresses these and other questions at greater length than we shall here. Kevin is a former fifth-generation Mormon who was born and raised in northern Utah. He is available to speak and consult on the subject of pseudo-Christian religions and many other subjects. Please contact him at kjb@summitoxford.org to request that he speak to your group.

Now that Mitt Romney is the Republican nominee for president, come January 20th, 2013, either Barack Obama will begin his second term as president or Mitt Romney will begin his first. Romney would be the first Mormon to become President of the United States of America.[1]

Is Mormonism Christian?

Mitt Romney is a member[2] of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (commonly known as the Mormon Church or the LDS Church). His religious beliefs are a serious consideration for many voters. According to a November 2011 poll of the Pew Research Center, 51 percent of Americans hold that Mormonism is Christian.[3] However, we find that few Christians know enough about the teachings of the Mormon Church to discern whether it is a Christian denomination.[4]

So, is the Mormon Church a Christian church?[5] Let us look briefly at some central Mormon teachings:

  1. What and who is God?
  2. What is the nature of humankind?
  3. What is the nature of Scripture?
  4. How does one acquire salvation?

As we will see, Mormons use the same theological words as Christians. This alone gives the impression that Mormons are Christians. But that is a mistaken impression. With other pseudo-Christian[6] religions (e.g., Jehovah’s Witnesses), Mormons use Christian vocabulary but have a very different dictionary.[7] Thus they have a different worldview.

The Mormon Church holds that following the deaths of the first apostles, there was a great apostasy and the gospel and church authority were lost from the earth.[8] They were restored through Joseph Smith, Jr. in the early-1800s. Mormons thus see their church as the one true church, with other churches being corrupted and without proper priesthood authority to administer saving ordinances such as baptism or communion.[9]

What and Who is God?

The Mormon Church teaches that God the Father once was a man who progressed to become a god,[10] that he has a wife,[11] and that all humans and other spirits are their literal offspring.[12] Mormons reject the Christian doctrine of the Trinity,[13][14] believing that God the Father, Jesus Christ,[15] and the Holy Spirit are three separate gods[16] who are unified in purpose.[17] Jesus is seen as the firstborn of God and his wife, with Lucifer being born later.[18] It is believed by Mormons that Jesus attained deity prior to his incarnation on earth.[19] He is our older brother and was literally conceived through a conjugal relationship between God the Father and Mary.[20]

What is the Nature of Humankind?

The Mormon Church teaches that all humans, prior to life on earth, were born as spirit children of God the Father and his wife(s).[21] Mormonism also teaches that Adam and Eve made a good and right choice in eating of the forbidden tree in the Garden of Eden.[22] Now, as a result of the fall, humans go through mortality with the opportunity of becoming exalted gods[23] by believing the teachings and obeying the practices of the Mormon Church.[24]

What is the Nature of Scripture?

The Bible (King James Version) is part of the Mormon canon of Scriptures, along with The Book of Mormon, The Doctrine and Covenants, and The Pearl of Great Price. However, the Mormon Church teaches that the Bible has been corrupted in both transmission and translation.[25] Mormons usually hold that their church leaders have sole authority to interpret the Scriptures correctly.

How Does One Acquire Salvation?

The Mormon Church teaches, in effect, that Jesus refinances our sins.[26] The Church teaches that salvation is through baptism and other ordinances and principles. Even so, all people but a few[27] will find a future in one of three heavenly kingdoms, the highest being the celestial kingdom.[28] The baptized faithful will obtain a place in the highest heaven, the celestial kingdom, with the most faithful among them being exalted and become gods themselves, as families, able to produce children eternally.[29] It is only those faithful who live in the presence of Heavenly Father forever. According to the LDS Church, the gospel principles one must obey to live with Heavenly Father forever include being baptized by a Mormon priest, receiving priesthood authority, obeying the Mormon prophets and apostles, and being eternally married[30] in a Mormon temple.[31]

In transparent comparison with the Christian faith, one can only conclude that Mormonism is not another Christian denomination but a pseudo-Christian religion.[32] Most contrasts and differences are plain, sometimes admitted by Mormon leaders, and stunningly profound; they include the nature of God (eternal or emergent), the nature of Jesus Christ (eternal deity or spirit child of God and literal brother of all other spirit), the number of gods (one or many), the nature of the fall of mankind (Adam and Eve’s actions were bad or good), and the way of salvation to the eternal presence of God (faith in Jesus Christ or special works and ordinances). Again, we have only briefly discussed the differences.[33]

Is the Mormon Church a Christian church? No, it is not. As we noted above: Mormons use Christian vocabulary but not a biblical dictionary. As such, profound confusion reigns when Mormonism is seen as a Christian denomination.

This conclusion should not be seen as accusing Mormons of being bad citizens or unfriendly people. Indeed, Mormons may be your best neighbors, capable co-workers, or among your friends at school. As a subculture in America, Mormons are taught to express many values that Christians also hold.

Can Christians Ever Vote for Mormons?

Many Christians have voiced several objections to voting for Mormons, and that without regard for the candidates’ proposed policies. Below we address some of these objections.

“Choosing between the lesser of two evils is evil, so even if the other candidate is worse, I can’t vote for a Mormon.”

As Summit President Dr. Jeff Myers points out in the new Political Animal course, this is a misguided objection, because it misses one crucial point: according to Romans 3:10, all of us, not just particular political candidates, are shot-through with sin. If taken to its logical conclusion, this objection would disallow Christians from being involved in any civil or social activity, politics or otherwise.

We also must not forget that in the United States, voting is only one of our civic responsibilities.[34] If candidates are elected and do evil, it is the citizens’ responsibility to hold the officials accountable through exposure, protest, the judiciary, and the next election.

“Mormons don’t believe in the one, true God.”

While this is true,[35] we ought to remember that in a republic such as ours, we do not elect preachers-in-chief as our presidents; we elect the best person seriously on offer for the job. Nowhere does the Bible stipulate that the only people who are to hold political authority are Christ’s followers. Take, for example, the following biblical heroes: Joseph in Egypt, Daniel in Babylon, or Esther in Persia. The apostle Paul, in Acts 25, appeals to Caesar as a Roman citizen.

These biblical heroes were asked to work for the good of others in the confines of often-hostile government leadership. Yet God did not ask them to overthrow or only support believing leadership. He taught them to live justly and to promote societal justice.

“A vote for a Mormon is a vote for the LDS church.”

When we vote for a candidate, we do not vote for all his or her ideas or ideals. That is impossible: people change their minds, and we cannot know all of a person’s opinions. Support for any candidate is not an endorsement of all of that candidate’s convictions. Again, a helpful approach would be to voting for a candidate the same as one would hire a candidate for a job. In this case, the job is to exercise political authority within the constraints of the nations’ laws.

While there are objections to be considered in voting for Mormons, there are also reasons to vote for Mormons, or for anyone with worldview convictions that differ from our own.

It is Christians’ role to be a preserving agent of a society.

As Jeremiah 29:4-7 reminds us, we are to seek the welfare of our city — of our most immediate communities. In other words, we are to be preserving agents, not just of cultures, but also of good political processes. And in our own republic, sometimes preserving the political process involves voting against someone as much as voting for someone. Therefore, if a candidate would not be our first choice to fill a political position, we can vote for that candidate in the hope that a worse candidate does not win.

Politics in a fallen world demands prudence.

Naturally, objections may be lodged against any candidate’s policy positions. The careful consideration of these questions is what political prudence is all about. For more information on issues such as economic, political, and religious freedom, check out our past Rapid Responses, Journals, and essays.

Sometimes, we must look at the practical results of a particular candidate’s victory. Who will a candidate surround himself with to help execute the office’s responsibilities? In the case of president, one of the most overlooked — but perhaps most important — functions is to appoint justices to the U.S. Supreme Court, who then can serve as long as they like. In fact, presidents appoint literally thousands of people in their cabinet, to judicial positions, and to regulatory agencies. And many of these individuals serve for life or at least well beyond the term(s) of the president.

Which candidate will best support the ideals necessary for the flourishing of our society: religious liberty, economic freedom, respect for life, and a proper ordering of the spheres of society? Prudence dictates that we take such political decisions into account when deciding how to cast our vote.

Summary

To summarize, Mormonism is not Christian, but that is not the only (and maybe not the leading) consideration when Christians vote. Christians may vote for candidates who are not Christians, for at issue is not the leadership of a local Christian church or Christian denomination. In the race for president, for example, our goal is not to elect a preacher-in-chief but a commander-in-chief.

Political engagement is neither easy nor optional, as Dr. Jeff Myers reminds us. But when we are equipped with biblical wisdom and make prayerful, careful deliberation, we can play our proper role as citizens and seek to shape our society for the well being of others.

Taken from: http://www.summit.org/blogs/summit-announcements/rapid-response-can-christians-vote-for-mormons/

Questions? Comments? Obscene Gesticulations?

SPIT THEM OUT!

Advertisements

Are you voting in the 2012 Presidential Election? Below is the Family Research Council (FRC) Voter Guide. Click on image to download PDF:

 

 

Republican presidential candidate, Jon Huntsman, says he is all out pro-life. He even has a “healthy pro-life record,” but after refusing to sign the Susan B. Anthony List Pledge, pro-lifers should no longer consider giving their vote to him (and other candidates who also did not sign the pledge) next November.

Read The Blaze report on this story:

HUNTSMAN CONFIRMS SUPPORT FOR EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH, REFUSES TO SIGN PRO-LIFE PLEDGE

Former Utah governor and current presidential candidate Jon Huntsman has what many deem a healthy pro-life record, but his recent, yet mild, support for embryonic stem cell research and his refusal to sign a prominent organization’s pro-life pledge may have a negative impact on his image among social conservatives.

Huntsman has been open and honest regarding his views on the GOP’s role in the pro-life movement. Earlier this month,Huntsman said the following to an audience at this year’s Faith and Freedom Coalition in Washington, D.C.:

“I do not believe that the Republican Party should only focus on our economic life, to the neglect of our human life. That is a trade we should not make.

If Republicans ignored life, the deficit we will face is one that is much more destructive. It will be a deficit of the heart and soul.”

Watch his remarks below:

Following this conference, the presidential candidate has created some angst, though, for pro-life advocates. According to LifeSiteNews.com, Huntsman spokesperson Tim Miller recently prepared a statement regarding embryonic stem cell research. While Miller writes that the former governor opposes funding for new lines that would harm embryos, he is not entirely closed off to embryonic research:

[Huntsman] “is a passionate supporter of stem cell research,” [and that he supports federal funding] “for lines that have a demonstrated history of success—adult stem cells, non-embryonic stem-cells and certain types of embryonic stem cell research.”

While this point may be concerning to some in the pro-life movement, it is Huntsman’s refusal to sign the Susan B. Anthony List’s “Pro-Life Presidential Leadership Pledge” that seems more controversial. The pledge, intended to reinforce candidates’ promises not to support abortion measures, will likely become a litmus test for some Americans who plan to only vote for those candidates who have signed it.

SBA List president Marjorie Dannenfelser was less than pleased with Huntsman’s refusal. In a statement, she said:

“It is extremely disappointing to see another candidate who is running on a pro-life message refuse to sign the promise to voters that he will act as a leader for our movement if elected to the White House.”

The release goes on to say the following:

Huntsman came out publically not long after announcing his candidacy to say that he does “not sign pledges,” an explanation that is not sitting well with pro-life Americans.

“In order to become President of the United States one has to take the pledge of all pledges: the Presidential oath of office,” Dannenfelser explained.  ”So really, Huntsman does take pledges, just not the kind which address specific issues he will face if elected President.”

Huntsman, of course, is not the only Republican candidate not to sign the pledge. Earlier this month, The Blaze reported on Mitt Romney’s refusal to do so. Herman Cain and Governor Gary Johnson also decided not to add their names to the list. That said, Rep. Michele Bachmann, former Speaker Newt Gingrich, Rep. Ron Paul, former Gov. Tim Pawlenty and Sen. Rick Santorum all signed on.

With fiscal matters at the forefront of the 2012 race already, it is difficult to assess just how important abortion will be when people head to the polls next year. But, for many, the issue remains at the forefront of their electoral decision-making. While Huntsman — like his peers who have declined being signatories — has certainly disappointed many, perhaps his record on the matter will speak for itself.

Taken from: The Blaze